Archive for the ‘Medical’ Category

Autism Treatment Acceleration Act – ATAA

Friday, May 15th, 2009

Autism Speaks, the nation’s largest autism science and advocacy organization, and Unlock Autism today applauded Representatives Mike Doyle (D-PA), Chris Smith (R-NJ), Eliot Engel (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-GA) for their introduction of a House companion bill to the Senate’s Autism Treatment Acceleration Act (ATAA), which was introduced last month by Senators Richard Durbin (D-IL), Robert Casey (D-PA), and Robert Menendez (D-NJ). Like the Senate version, the House version of the ATAA (H.R. 2413) is comprehensive federal legislation that addresses several critical challenges facing the autism community, including increased funding for scientific research, treatment and services. The ATAA incorporates provisions from the Expanding the Promise of Individuals with Autism Act (EPIAA), originally proposed by Representatives Doyle, Smith, Engel, and former-Representative Chip Pickering.

A welcome sign of relief  to many who routinely spend $30-$50k on therapy’s – not even considered for reimbursement by insurance companies.

As in the Senate’s ATAA bill, a key section of the House bill requires all insurance companies to provide coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of autism spectrum disorder (ASDs), including coverage of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy – a medically-necessary, evidence-based autism treatment. While the number of states that have enacted comprehensive autism insurance reform legislation has grown to ten, most state insurers are still allowed to specifically exclude coverage for these critical services, which can cost upward of $50,000 a year – well beyond the means of most families.

The House version of the bill also addresses the unique needs of adults with ASDs, creating a demonstration project with one-year planning grants and multi-year implementation grants for the provision of service for adults with autism. In addition, it creates the Network for Autism Spectrum Disorders Research and Services aimed at accelerating the dissemination and utilization of critical, new information, moving it from “bench to bedside” as quickly as possible.

Autism Wall Chart

Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

You may recall seeing the Eye Chart last time you visited the doctor. Today it is also common to see the entire human body chart, inner ear chart, neck, back and knee joint models and other props for the doctor to use with patients when explaining our all too common ailments.

With the explosive growth of Autism rates, can we expect to see more of this chart appearing in a pediatricians office near you?

Chart fo Autistic Behvaiors

Seizure Risk Prompts Change in Vaccination Guidelines

Monday, March 17th, 2008

Seems a bit like covering one’s tracks here. Seizures and Autism commonly go – hand in hand and can trigger serious health issues which lie dormant in the body.

Written and owned By Michael Smith, North American Correspondent, MedPage Today Published: March 14, 2008

Reviewed by Dori F. Zaleznik, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

ATLANTA, March 14 — An apparent increased risk of febrile seizures has led the CDC to soften one of its recommendations on immunizing children against measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella with a combination vaccine.

The agency had said the combination tetravalent vaccine against the four diseases (ProQuad) was to be preferred over vaccination with a trivalent measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine at the same time as a separate varicella shot.

That preferential recommendation has been withdrawn. The agency’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) now says there should be no preference, the CDC said in the March 14 issue of Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

The change comes after review of data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which monitors vaccine safety, as well as preliminary results from a post-licensing study conducted by Merck, which makes the tetravalent vaccine.

The Vaccine Safety Datalink, the CDC said, showed a signal of increased risk for seizure among children ages 12 to 23 months who were given the tetravalent vaccine, compared with those who got the trivalent vaccine.

The increased rates were seen seven to 12 days after vaccination.

Once the signal was seen, the agency said, analysts used the Vaccine Safety Datalink for a study comparing seizure rates among children who got the tetravalent vaccine and those who got a trivalent vaccine plus a varicella vaccine at the same visit.

The analysis included 43,353 children ages 12 to 23 months who received the tetravalent vaccine and 314,599 who received the trivalent vaccine and varicella vaccine at the same visit.

The researchers reviewed medical records to validate the diagnosis and used a multivariate logistic regression to adjust for age and influenza season, the CDC said.

Results of that analysis showed:

* A rate of nine febrile seizures per 10,000 vaccinations among recipients of the tetravalent vaccine.
* The rate was four per 10,000 vaccinations among those who got the trivalent vaccine along with the varicella vaccine.
* The adjusted odds ratio was 2.3, with a 95% confidence interval from 1.6 to 3.2, which was significant at P<0.0001.
* Of the 166 children who had febrile seizures after vaccination and had hospitalization information available, 26 (or 16%) were admitted to a hospital.
* There were no deaths.

The advisory committee was told that interim data from the Merck post-licensing study showed a similar relative risk for seizure, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Only about half of the final sample size needed was available for the analysis.

Neither study looked at the risk of a febrile seizure after the second recommended dose of the vaccine, at ages four through six years.

The CDC noted that the tetravalent vaccine is currently in short supply in the U.S., because of manufacturing problems not related to safety, and is not expected to be widely available before 2009.

The agency also said that febrile seizures are not uncommon in children and generally have an excellent prognosis.

Additional source: CDC
Source reference:
CDC “Update: Recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding administration of combination MMRV vaccine” MMWR 2008; 57(10): 258-60.

Study to Explore Early Development (SEED)

Wednesday, February 6th, 2008

What is SEED?

SEED stands for the Study to Explore Early Development. It is a 5-year, multi-site collaborative study that will help identify what might put children at risk for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and other developmental disabilities. It is being conducted by six study sites and a data coordinating center called the Centers for Autism and Developmental Disabilities Research and Epidemiology (CADDRE) Network.

What are the six CADDRE centers?

The six CADDRE centers are:

* California CADDRE: Kaiser Permanente Division of Research and the California Department of Health Services
* Colorado CADDRE: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and the University of Colorado at Denver and Heath Sciences Center
* Georgia CADDRE: the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
* Maryland CADDRE: Johns Hopkins University and Kennedy Krieger Institute
* North Carolina CADDRE: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
* Pennsylvania CADDRE: University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing and The Children’s Hospital of Pennsylvania

Where exactly is SEED being conducted?

California

a two county area: Alameda and Santa Clara counties

Colorado

the seven-county Denver metropolitan area: (Arapahoe, Adams, Boulder, Broomfield, Denver, Douglas, and Jefferson counties).

Georgia (CDC)

the five-county metropolitan Atlanta area: Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton, and Gwinnett counties.

Maryland

seven jurisdictions in northeastern Maryland: Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Cecil, Harford and Howard Counties and Baltimore City.

North Carolina

a ten county area: Alamance, Chatham, Davidson, Durham, Forsyth, Guilford, Johnston, Orange, Randolph, and Wake counties.

Pennsylvania

three counties: Chester, Montgomery and Philadelphia counties.

*CDC also funds Michigan State University to run the study’s Data Coordinating Center and Johns Hopkins University to run the study’s central laboratory.

How were the sites selected?

The sites were originally picked through an open competitive review process in 2001 and funded for 5 years. The sites were selected based on the merit of their application. In 2006, CDC had a limited competitive review process and funded the sites for another 5 years.

How can I enroll my child into the study?

The study is a population based study – meaning that the participants will be recruited from all children and families in each study community who meet certain criteria rather then focusing on individuals at a specific clinic or school. Families of children with specific developmental conditions, as well as a random sample of all children born in the community will be invited to participate. If the invited family is interested, then we ask some questions to determine if they are eligible, and if they are eligible then the family is enrolled.

Can I sign my child up for this study?

Although families can self-refer to participate in this study, they have to fulfill certain criteria in order to be eligible. Some families who self refer may not be eligible. Our goal is to send letters of invitation to all families who may fulfill the eligibility criteria. By sending letters of invitation to as many eligible families as possible, we hope to enroll a representative sample of families in each study area.

Examples of the study eligibility criteria include – the child must be born within the study period, the child must be born and still living in the study area, they must have a legal guardian, they must know English or Spanish (although these vary by site), and they must also meet certain diagnostic criteria.

What will each study participant have to do?

Each parent or caregiver will have to answer questions about their child’s development and their family’s medical history. The study clinicians will perform a brief exam and developmental tests on the child. Each parent and child will have to give small samples of blood, cells from inside the mouth, and a sample of the child’s hair. Finally, we would access the mother’s and the child’s medical records.

Why are we only looking at children in 6 states?

The funding for the study allowed us to support 6 study sites around the country.

Why are we only looking at children between the ages of 2-5?

The study will focus on children who are 2 to 5 years old. This age range was selected to reduce the amount of time since pregnancy and early development so that parent recall of events during these time periods is better, so that medical information is easier to retrieve, so that families are less likely to have moved away from the study area, and it will also be nearer the beginning of treatment for children in developmental intervention programs.

What is being investigated, and why?

* Physical and behavioral characteristics – Autism is a complex disorder and we want to better understand the full range of characteristics that are associated with autism. In this way, we may also better understand how the different causes of autism may be associated with specific subgroups of children within the autism spectrum.
* Infection and immune function, including autoimmunity – We want to follow up on reports that infections, or an abnormal response to infection – called the body’s immune response – may increase the risk for autism.
* Reproductive and hormonal features – We want to follow up on reports that abnormal hormone function – perhaps in the mother when she is trying to get pregnant, or later during pregnancy, or even later in the child after birth – may be associated with autism.
* Gastrointestinal features – We want to follow-up on reports that children with autism have abnormal gastrointestinal function, and whether it may be related to the causes of autism.
* Genetic features – Autism is a highly genetic disorder, but in particular we want to see if the genes that may be related to risk factors we are investigating – such as the genes that control immune function – are associated with autism.
* Socio-demographic features – We want to better understand the social, demographic, and economic features of families that are associated with having a child with autism.
* Smoking and alcohol use in pregnancy – Substance use in pregnancy can potentially harm the developing fetus and so we want to see if these so-called lifestyle factors are associated with autism.
* Sleep features – We want to follow-up on reports that children with autism have abnormal sleep patterns.
* Select mercury exposures – There are several studies, including studies funded by the government, looking at environmental exposures related to autism including mercury. CADDRE didn’t want to duplicate the work of these other studies, but we chose to look at information on vaccines and other types of medical procedures that may have mercury exposure that we can get through medical records.
* Occupational exposures – There are several studies, including studies funded by the government, looking at environmental exposures related to autism including mercury. CADDRE didn’t want to duplicate the work of these other studies, but we chose to ask parents to report to us about possible exposures they may have had at their jobs.

We selected these research factors after an extensive review of the literature. We designated each of the factors as high priority based on the how strongly they seemed to be associated with ASD and what new information we needed to collect about each factor, balanced by how well we could study each factor with our particular study methods.

What “selected mercury exposures” will be studied? How will they be studied? Why were these selected?

The mercury exposures we are looking at relate to vaccines or other medical treatments that are being studied include – vaccines that the mom received during pregnancy, the child’s vaccine exposures after birth and specific other factors such as RhoGAM treatment in pregnancy if the mom has developed an immune response against the fetus that can harm it.

There are several studies, including studies funded by the government, looking at environmental exposures related to autism including mercury. SEED didn’t want to duplicate the work of these other studies, but since we are getting medical records, we choose to look at information on vaccines and other types of medical procedures that may have mercury exposure that we can get through medical records.

Will the study include vaccines as a potential cause of autism?

Yes, the study will include vaccines. The mercury exposures being studies include – vaccines that the mom received during pregnancy, the child’s vaccine exposures after birth and specific other factors such as RhoGAM treatment in pregnancy if the mom has developed an immune response against the fetus that can harm it.

There are several studies, including studies funded by the government, now looking at environmental exposures in autism such as mercury. SEED doesn’t want to duplicate the work of these other studies, but since we are getting medical records, we choose to look at information on vaccines and other types of medical procedures that may have mercury exposure that we can get through medical records.

Will CDC find out if thimerosal causes autism?

It is too soon to speculate on the results of the study. We hope the study will give us a better idea of which of the risk factors that we will be looking at seem to be the most important in causing autism.

If the study shows that thimerosal is a cause of autism, will CDC report the data? What guarantees does the public have that the findings won’t be covered up?

We will report all the findings of the study by following the normal scientific review process as soon as possible.

When the study is completed, will we know the causes of autism?

It is too soon to speculate on the results of the study. We hope the study will give us a better idea of which of the risk factors that we will be looking at seem to be the most important in causing autism. The causes may be related to genes, the environment, or a relationship between the two – such as if some groups of children with certain genes are more easily harmed by some environmental exposures.

Will this study find a prevention/cure for autism?

It is too soon to speculate on what we might find about the causes of autism. But, we are hopeful that the findings from SEED will help the development of future studies specifically designed to assess treatments among children with autism.

What are the other developmental disabilities being studied?

We will be studying a range of other developmental disabilities, including mental retardation, developmental delay, and other behavioral problems in early childhood.

Why are we looking at other developmental disabilities?

By comparing children with autism and children with other developmental disabilities we will try to see if the risk factors we observe in children with autism are unique to autism or if they are also important in children with other developmental problems.

Looking at children with other developmental disabilities will also provide a way of comparing responses of children with developmental disabilities, in general, versus typically developing children.

How will you get the names of children to invite into the study?

We are working with our partners in the community who serve children with developmental problems and through these partners we will be sending out letters to families to invite them to participate.

Why didn’t or doesn’t the 2001/2002 funding represent “the first national study”?

In the initial grant awards (2001/2002), the grantees were responsible for 3 activities: setting up monitoring programs for autism and other developmental disorders, collaboration on the multi-site epidemiologic study, and investigator-initiated special studies. Although the multi-site study was planned, funding levels were not adequate to implement the multi-site study during the 2002/2002 funding cycle. Consequently, implementation was delayed until the current funding cycle. All funds awarded to the grantees in the current grant cycle are dedicated to implementation of the multi-site study. The grantees competed for funding to continue their monitoring activities under a separate grant announcement earlier in 2006, and no funding will be available for investigator-initiated special studies.

In what way(s) will the sample populations be representative of all children?

It seems that by not including major states like New York, Illinois, Texas, etc. it’s hard to claim this is “nationally representative”? Further, how will the selection/recruitment processes ensure or foster generalizability?

The two groups of children with ASD and other developmental problems will be identified in multiple clinical and educational facilities in each community to insure that the participants are representative of all children with these types of developmental problems – and not just children who might be seen at a single clinic or intervention program. The third group of study children will be randomly selected from all children born in each community during the same time period so that they are representative of all children in the study area most of whom do not have developmental problems.

Although resources do not permit the sample to be drawn so that it is statistically representative of all children in the nation, by conducting the study in 6 different geographic areas across the country with diverse populations and by identifying children from multiple sources in each community we hope to have a study sample that more closely represents children with ASD, other developmental problems, and typical development across the country.

Will there be interim results or will the study first have results six or so years from now?

Many of the core study hypotheses will require that we have data collection completed on the full study sample before analysis can take be completed, but some interim analyses that require less than the full study sample may be possible. We don’t want to rush interim analyses, however, before we have a good representative sample of children.

What do you mean by “community diversity”?

SEED is located in select study areas within 6 states: 2 counties in the San Francisco, California area, 7 counties in the Denver, Colorado area, 5 counties in the Atlanta, Georgia area, 7 counties in the Baltimore and northeast Maryland area, 10 counties in central North Carolina, and 3 counties in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania area.

These study areas include diverse communities and populations from which study participants will be drawn.

Can this really be classified as a national study since it only involves six states?

It is a multi-site study set in diverse communities in 6 locations around the country: California, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania.

Although resources do not permit the sample to be drawn so that it is statistically representative of all children in the nation, by conducting the study in 6 different geographic areas across the country with diverse populations and by identifying children from multiple sources in each community we hope to have a study sample that more closely represents children with ASD, other developmental problems, and typical development across the country.

How will this give us national insight?

Compared to a study located in a single area, our study in six different areas gives us geographic and community diversity that will give us greater insights into the variability of who is at risk and what are the risk factors for autism.

What is the methodology for collecting the data? Same for each state?

Yes, all the sites are using a common study protocol – meaning they are following the same procedures for recruiting participants and collecting data so that, at the end, the data from all 6 sites can be pooled into a single large data base for analysis.

We will be asking participants to complete self-administered questionnaires; interviewing mothers about pregnancy-related issues and developmental conditions in their children; conducting a developmental exam of each study child to evaluate cognitive and

emotional development, language and adaptive skills, and motor skills, and a dysmorphology exam of the child (that will look at physical features that may indicate an underlying genetic condition); taking cheek swab and blood samples from the mother; father, and child; taking a hair sample from the child; and looking at the mother and child’s medical records.

Do all 2,700 of the children have an ASD?

No, there will be 900 children in each of 3 groups: children with ASDs, children with other developmental problems, and children drawn from the community most of whom are typically developing.

I live in one of the states with a CADDRE center. Who can I contact for more information about the study?

California CADDRE
Kaiser Permanente Division of Research
California Department of Health Services
Oakland, CA
510.620.3700

Colorado CADDRE
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
University of Colorado at Denver and Heath Sciences Center
Denver, CO
303.315.0066
303.692.2680

Georgia CADDRE
National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
Atlanta, GA
404.498.3800

Maryland CADDRE
Johns Hopkins University
Kennedy Krieger Institute
Baltimore, MD
877.868.8014

North Carolina CADDRE
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC
919.966.2068

Pennsylvania CADDRE
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing
The Children’s Hospital of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA
215.573.2469
215.590.7474

Date: December 19, 2007
Content source: National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities

Mainstream medicine is beginning to pay serious attention to ASD

Thursday, May 17th, 2007

SAN FRANCISCO, May 11 (UPI) — On the question of extraneous physical problems that beset many children with autism, many practitioners and parents are starting to come together.Mainstream medicine is beginning to pay serious attention to, and act upon, parents’ long-dismissed contention that something other than the disorder itself is affecting their children’s health.

An increasing number of specialists have started to aggressively treat and study the relevance to autism of medical conditions — including acid reflux, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal ailments, sleep disturbances, food allergies and metabolic irregularities that make it difficult for the body to adequately break down certain biochemicals.

These maladies are commonly experienced by autistic children and may be contributing to their behavioral problems but often go undetected due to lack of physician awareness and patient articulation, doctors say.

A major move toward correcting that oversight has come with the establishment by six leading hospitals of the Autism Treatment Network.

Among priorities topping its agenda, the group is drawing up national guidelines for providing autistic children with physical examinations complete enough to catch any underlying medical conditions. It also plans to conduct clinical trials to identify problems that are most likely to affect this patient group.

One large and largely overlooked health issue facing children, especially adolescents, with autism is common to most American youth: failure to stay in shape, according to a six-year Indiana University review.

Just like all youngsters, those with autism spectrum disorders can give their bodies and minds a lift by kicking up their activity level. However, they are given an even skimpier possibility than their peers to exercise their right to fitness, the researchers said.

Many districts have eliminated or minimized structured school-based opportunities for burning calories and building muscle, such as recess and physical education. In addition, community-based programs frequently are thin on trained staff and support services needed by autistic youngsters.

Young people with autism spectrum disorders often aren’t in the running for team sports which require a quick pickup on social cues to keep the game moving.

What’s more, having no physical disability, they do not qualify for such events as wheelchair racing or Special Olympics, although some have succeeded in getting exemptions, the authors noted.

What may fit the bill for these athletes-in-waiting are individual or two-person sports, such as swimming, tennis, running and martial arts, doctors advised. Such activities provide a touch of the social element without making heavy demands for personal contact, they advised